Risk Management according to the Internal Control Standards of School Administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education
Abstract:
The purposes of this study were 1) to study the level of risk management according to the internal control standards of school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education, 2) to compare the level of risk
management according to the internal control standards of school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education classified by gender, position and work experience and 3) to process problems and suggestions on risk
management according to the internal control standards of school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education. The population used in this research was 433 teachers in Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-formal and
informal Education and 202 of them were used as a sample group. The sample size was determined by using Krejcie and Morgans table. The tool was a questionnaire. Data was analyzed by using package software and statistics used were mean, percentage, standard deviation, t-Test and F-test
Independent study found that;
1. Risk management level according to the internal control standards of school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education was overall at a high level.
2. Comparison of risk management according to the internal control standardsof school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education classified by gender, was significant difference at 0.05 level, which was as assumptions. However, there was no different in position and work experience.
3. There were suggestions for risk management according to the internal control standards of school administrators under Pattani Provincial Office of the Non-Formal and Informal Education. Firstly, the school administrators should assign all departments to manage the risk under responsibilities. Secondly, to follow regulations and requirements were also recommended. Moreover, to manage information system, update for administration and decision, and follow up to evaluate risk management were suggested.