Abstract:
The objective of this research is to study concepts and theories, types, and components of the state and constitution, as well as analyze the evolution of political institutions and governance in the Kingdom of Thailand and the Republic of Singapore from past to present. It compares the systems and processes regarding the exercise of power by the head of state, government, and parliament, including the impact of the constitution on political stability in both countries. Additionally, the study seeks to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of both governance systems to develop policy recommendations for improving Thailand's constitution and political institutions to ensure greater stability and benefit for its people.
The findings indicate that Thailand faces instability in its governance system due to frequent constitutional changes, contrasting with Singapore, which updates its constitution to modernize without repealing the original version. This approach contributes to the stability and high integrity of Singapores political institutions. The two countries have distinct structures and functions of political institutions, with Singapore emphasizing a parliamentary system characterized by transparency and clear checks and balances. In contrast, Thailand continues to face limitations in governance integrity and political continuity.
The recommendations from this study suggest that Thailands constitution should be developed to ensure greater flexibility and stability, minimizing the need for frequent replacements and promoting amendments that respond to contemporary social and political contexts. Furthermore, it is essential to enhance the governance of political institutions to foster greater transparency and accountability. Promoting public participation in political processes is also crucial to achieving long-term stability in the countrys democratic system.