Abstract:
The purposes of this research were to 1) study the level of Instructional leadership of educational institute administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area, 2) compare the level of Instructional Leadership of school administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area classified by variable gender, school size and work experience, 3) process suggestions for Instructional leadership of educational institution administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area. The population of this study consisted of 210 teachers. The research instrument was a questionnaire analyzed the data by using a packaged program and a percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test and F-test.
The study found that;
1.The overall level of Instructional leadership of educational institute administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area was high.
2.The comparison the of academic leadership of school administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area classified by gender, school size and working experiences, the overall and individual aspects were not different. Considering individual aspects, it was found that the opinions on academic leadership of educational institution administrators were significantly different at the .05 level.
3.The suggestions for instructional leadership of school administrators under the Narathiwat Secondary Education Service Area. They should develop the school goal for improving the academic performance of school every level and should indicate the academic goal for the participation of school staffs. The administrators should communicate with all relevant people such as teachers, students and parents to know the regulation and the school academic goal. Posters or announcements showing the importance of school academic affairs should be provided. The academic success depended on the students academic achievement. The director use information about student achievement in making decisions about curriculum implementation and should supervise the creation of a test to measure student achievement in accordance with expected learning outcomes and learning content. The director should meet with teachers individually to discuss student academic progress and test results should be used to assess the school's progress toward academic goals.