Abstract:
This study profiles and peruses different ways of thinking that are pathological to moral judgement. Based
on the interviews with respondents who experienced passing and receiving moral judgement as well as
conversations with social science and philosophy academics, the study profiles ten pathological attitudes that
viewed moral judgment as an exercise in hypocrisy, moral superiority and perfectionism, judgementalism,
negativity, interference, moral vagueness, sentimentalism, and profanity. In like manner, those who make moral
judgement are stereotyped as hypocrites, judgmental, negative, hostile, arrogant, self-righteous, and intolerant.
These negative stereotypes discourage people from engaging in moral judgement in the public sphere. As moral
judgement becomes a social pariah, the moral order degenerates, aggravating the culture of moral indifference
that characterizes most contemporary societies. Counteracting the phenomenon of moral dissipation entails the
emancipation of moral judgement from pathological attitudes. A constructive and responsible exercise of moral
judgement is paramount to maintenance of the moral borders and boundaries in society.