Abstract:
This study aimed to study the academic leadership of the school administrators. Under the Office of Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area 3 And to compare the academic leadership of the school administrators Under the Office of Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area 3 according to the opinions of administrators and teachers classified by sex. Highest qualification Performance status And working experience The samples used in this research were education institution administrators and teachers in educational institutes. Under the Office of Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area 3, Academic Year 2020, totaling 438 people, separated into 103 school administrators and 335 teachers in educational institutes By the sampling method stratified by distric. The research instruments were divided into 2 parts, part 1: General information of respondents and part 2, Academic Leadership of School Administrators. The statistics used for data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation. The statistics used to test the hypothesis were T-test, and a double difference test with the Scheffe method. The results of the study showed that 1) the academic leadership of the school administrators. Under the Office of Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area 3, the overall level was at a high level. When considering each aspect, it was found that all aspects had opinions at a high level. Where the side with the highest mean is The development of an environment that supports learning, followed by teaching and leamning management and promoting the school's learning environment. And the side with the lowest mean is in the supervision and use of feedback in the teaching and learning process 2) A comparison of the academic leadership levels of the school administrators Under the Office of Chiang Rai Primary Education Service Area 3 found that the administrators and teachers with sex Highest qualification Performance status And working experience is different. There were statistically significant differences in opinions about academic leadership among school administrators at the 0.05 level.