Abstract:
This research aims. Project-driven philosophy in schools. Under the Municipal Kanchanaburi By applying the model to evaluate the CIPP model (CIPP Model) and to find a good practice (best practice) of project-driven philosophy in schools of 853 research instruments were questionnaires and interviews. The statistics used in the analysis were mean, standard deviation. And content analysis The research results revealed that:
Part 1: An evaluation of the project
1. On the context, it was found that the objectives corresponded to the policy of the Basic Education Committee Office and of schools, in accordance with the state of school problems, with the mean at a high level.
2. On the input, it indicated that the enough personnel in charge of the project were appointed by schools. They were knowledgeable and understanding. , with the mean at a high level.
3. On the process, it revealed that schools followed the set operation plan.The implementation plan was clear and related personnel participated in setting the plan for all
activities based on the scheduled time. The mean was at a high level.
4. On the product, it was found that there was an evaluation of 2 aspects as follows:
4.1 On the output, it was found that had activities encourage knowledge and the
activity develops the students, with the mean at a high level.
4.2 On the impact, it indicated that it had difference was clear, personnel in each faction got useful from sufficiency economic principle, Also they were leading their life.
Part 2: The best practice of the project
It was discovered that teassban 3 School was the school with best practice of this project.
1. On the context, it revealed that school personnel and related people recognized the importance of the project and were determine to accomplish the project.
2. On the input, it followed that prominent point of school gave cherished possession for personnel in school for the output successful.
3. On the process, it indicated that all activities were carried out according to the plan was system. Supervision, follow-up, and evaluation .
4. On the product divide in 2 aspects as follows:
4.1 On the output, it showed that students gave importance, attend and minister the activities of project.
4.2 On the impact, it pointed out that the communities accepted and recognized the importance of carrying out all activities in the project