Abstract:
บทคัดย่อภาษาอังกฤษ
The objectives of this research were to: 1) study the development model of the administrators competency of basic educational institutions for learning organization; and 2) evaluate the appropriateness and feasibility of the model. The research process was divided into 2 phases. Phase 1 developing the model consisted of 3 steps: 1) study concept and theory of competency and learning organization; 2) conduct an interview of 9 competent administrators and educators, derived by purposive sampling, by using an interview form as an instrument; and 3) organize group discussion of 8 connoisseurs, derived by purposive sampling, using group discussion issues as an instrument. Phase 2 confirmatory factor analysis of the model consisted of 2 steps: 1) conduct confirmatory factor analysis with 461 directors and deputy directors, derived by stratified random sampling. The instruments used in this procedure were a questionnaire with content validity between 0.80 1.00 and the internal consistency reliability coefficient of 0.86 and an interview from. Data were analyzed with percentage, mean, standard deviation, and confirmatory factor analysis. 2) Evaluate the model by using connoisseurship seminar with 8 connoisseurs derived by purposive sampling. The instruments were appropriateness and feasibility evaluation form and issues of connoisseurship seminar developed by the researcher. Data were analyzed with mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.
The findings of this research were as follows:
1. The administrators competency uprising model of basic educational institutions for learning organization was divided into 4 sections, consisted of 14 factors: 1) core competency comprised innovative thinking, learning and development, and creative leadership; 2) functional competency comprised building learning team, personnel development for learning, building learning community, and knowledge application to environment; 3) personal attribute comprised model for morality, inspiration building, creative communication, and professional coaching; and 4) managerial competency comprised systematic planning, performance efficiency monitoring, and performance assessment.
2. The school administrators competency model of basic educational institutions for learning organization had goodness of fit with empirical data (X2 = 42.10, df = 55, p = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.00, GFI = 0.99, AGFI = 0.98, Largest Standardized Residual = 1.90). The appropriateness and feasibility of school administrators competency model overall was at the highest level.