Pakanan Sisuk. Exploring indirect expressions of negative attitudes reflecting untruthfulness in American drama films. Master's Degree(English for communication). Burapha University. Library. : Burapha University, 2017.
Exploring indirect expressions of negative attitudes reflecting untruthfulness in American drama films
Abstract:
This study aimed to comprehend untruthfulness by exploring the indirect
expressions of negative attitudes, abbreviated as IENAs, in verbal interactions among the
mainstream Americans. The purposes of this thesis were first to investigate the four
different types of IENAs used in each age group of the mainstream Americans and
second to identify the underlying subtypes of IENAs. The 749 samples spoken by the
mainstream American characters from three American drama films released in 2014 were
collected. Some extraneous findings counted as proofs to verify existence of the mixed
types of IENAs were found altogether 27 samples among the authentic verbal
interactions, and not considered as the overlapping results of the study.
To be specific, the mainstream American characters varied by their age groups
(e.g. adolescence, early adulthood, middle adulthood, and later maturity) are likely to
flout the quality maxim in form of IENAs most when in their middle adulthood and least
in later maturity. In the first place, the mainstream American teenagers in adolescence
(13-19 years old) produced untruthfulness (type: rhetorical devices / subtype: insertion) in
order to express themselves towards new relationship and to be able to embrace selfdependence. People in this age group were expected to have space in the world peacefully
with self-taught values and ethical mindset. However, the neutralized IENAs were found
in early adulthood. The type rhetorical devices with the subtype insertion and the type
paralinguistic cues with the subtype slow speaking rate were significantly mentioned.
All individuals age between 19-30 years old have personal rights to start a family and
take on civic responsibility. People in early adulthood were said to be in a threshold of
life with countless decisions to make and with all emotions to control (joy, anger, disgust
or honesty). Next, the mainstream Americans in their middle adulthood (31-60 years old)
were seen to produce diplomatic untruthfulness; the mostly-used subtypes under the type
rhetorical devices were to be discussed: generalizing, rhetorical questions, metaphor,
converted ideas, and derogatory remarks. With a quite complex and well-organized
thinking process to live a life, the language they use can reflect their diplomatic status in
most of the conversations disregarding pros and cons in mind. The last focus of the
discussion was the type rhetorical devices with the subtype stylistic expressions found
in later maturity. The mainstream Americans in later maturity thus chose to be more
conservative when they employed IENAs according to their defensive strategy to get over
both of what is forgettable and memorable (i.e. a life after retirement, a decreasing
income, death of a spouse etc.). All of the cause mentioned made these people who were
aged more than 61 years old tended to produce untruthfulness in a very specific way; they
intended to use a shortened string of words rather than delivering an imprecise and longer
sentence.