Abstract:
The research was intended in educated achivement comparison between the conventional strategies and the instructive discovery by the
assumtion that the students who learned the instructive discovery earned higher scores in knowledge and comprehensive level than those
who learned from the conventional strategy.
The working started from studying the conventional strategy in the ohm's law content and developrd to be the structive discovery. The structive
discovery was aooroved by 5 content experts in rightness and completeness of the contents.
The after working was developing the test items and the observation sheets.It was choosing test items that having 40 choices of items to be
the proof tools teaching achivement.The quality of the test items were at significant differences of 0.50, the value of difficulty was at 0.64,the reliabitiy was at 0.83.
The researcher used both of the ways in teaching tried with sample group students who were the third year learning in occupation line and technology 3, in the
academic year 2006 from Mathyomdankunthod School.Thirty students of M.3/3 were the test-group. The researcher used the structive discovery,and the studernts
of M.3/4 abouter 30 persons were assigned as a controled group learning with the convrntional teaching strategy. The determined achivement of learning of both
experiments was conducted by T-test statistics.
The research revealed that the students learned from the structive discovery and the conventional teaching strategy by themselves.The overall achivement level was at
a significant difference of 0.01.