Sayamon Hongjaisee. Development of assays to determine coreceptor usage and study of molecular determinants of HIV-1 CRF01_AE coreceptor switching. Doctoral Degree(Biomedical Science). Chiang Mai University Library. : Chiang Mai University, 2016.
Development of assays to determine coreceptor usage and study of molecular determinants of HIV-1 CRF01_AE coreceptor switching
Abstract:
Since CCR5 antagonist has been approved for treating HIV-1 infected patients
whose harbor only CCR5-using viruses, the determination of coreceptor usage is strictly
recommended prior to prescription to exclude the presence of CXCR4-using viruses or
dual/mixed viruses. In Thailand, there was no access to assays to determine the
coreceptor usage that limited the clinical use of coreceptor antagonists. Moreover, there
was no data to support the phenotypic assay to determine the coreceptor usage in HIV-1
CRF01_AE, which is the predominant subtype circulating in Thailand and Southeast
Asia. As regards, this study aimed to develop the phenotypic assay to determine the
coreceptor usage in Thai clinical samples. The entire envelope glycoprotein was
amplified in triplicate amplifications and generated the env-pseudotyped viruses to
infect the indicator cell lines bearing specific coreceptors. The coreceptor usage was
successfully determined in 18 treatment-experienced patients; 14 patients harbored only
CCR5-using viruses, 3 patients harbored dual/mixed viruses, and one patient harbored
only CXCR4-using viruses. Furthermore, the results of phenotypic assay were used as a
reference to evaluate the performances of various genotypic predictors for the prediction
of the coreceptor usage. The same env fragment used to produce pseudotyped virus was
sequenced in V3 region by bulk sequencing and determined the coreceptor usage using
j
predictors. The best results in terms of concordance, sensitivity, and specificity were
obtained using Geno2pheno[coreceptor] at FPR 5% (78%, 100%, and 71%, respectively).
However, the genotypic predictors were interpreted with algorithms, which have been
developed using mostly data of HIV-1 subtype B and may be inaccurate and
inappropriate for non-B subtypes. At this point, the Support Vector Machine based on
Logistic Model Trees (SVM/LMT) method, which based on HIV-1 CRF01_AE subtype
training data was specifically developed and proposed for prediction of coreceptor
usage in this subtype. SVM was used as a classifier to classify the class of coreceptor
usage whereas LMT selected the most relevant positions on V3 loop, which could be
differentiated between CCR5 and CXCR4. For the optimized method, using only nine
positions obtained from LMT model, the predictive performance of SVM reached a
predictive accuracy as high as 97.8%, whereas the specificity and sensitivity were as
high as 97.7% and 97.9%, respectively, which can improve the classification of the
coreceptor usage for HIV-1 CRF01_AE subtype and could be used as a prediction tool.
However, the effect of these selected amino acid positions on coreceptor binding of
CRF01_AE viruses is little known. In this regard, this study also aimed to describe the
role of selected amino acid positions in V3 loop of HIV-1 CRF01_AE subtype on
functional property and coreceptor interaction. HIV-1 CRF01_AE R5-env plasmids
were used to construct the mutants at position 5, 7, 11, 12, 18, 27, and 32 within V3
loop using PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis, which were performed in both single
and combinations mutations in 16 patterns. All mutant viruses containing these
substitution amino acids were produced based on env-pseudotyped viruses and
determined the coreceptor usage using phenotypic assay in U373 cells expressing either
CCR5 or CXCR4. The infectivity of viruses containing single mutations at position 7,
11, 18, and 32 including combination mutation at position 5 and 32, 18 and 32 were
significantly decreased in CCR5-expressing cells, which could be interrupt the
interaction between V3 loop and CCR5 coreceptor. However, the amino acid
substitutions either single or combination mutations did not confer to use CXCR4 as a
coreceptor, excepting the arginine substitution at position 11. The viral infectivity of
S11R mutant was significantly increased in CXCR4-expressing cells but it did not
support for coreceptor switching. Although, alterations within V3 loop are necessary for
k
coreceptor binding, but still are not sufficient for switching. Other regions, besides V3,
may maintain viral fitness to mediate CCR5 usage.
In summary, the assays for determination of coreceptor usage have been
developed in both phenotypic and genotypic assays. The genotypic assay was preferred
due to its accessible, simple and suitable for laboratories especially in resource-limited
countries. Moreover, understanding of V3 genetic determinants could be served as a
foundation for future research into therapeutics and development of new drugs that
specifically target CRF01_AE infections.