Expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of radio correspondence group organizers in radio correspondence functional education levels three and four programs as percetved by themselves, administrators, and learners in the northern region
Abstract:
Purposes of the study The specific purposes of this research are as follows: 1. To study the expected and actual rules in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs as perceived by themselves, administrators and learners in the Northern Region. 2. To compare the difference among the perception of themselves, administrators and learners on the expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs 3. To compare the difference between the expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs as perceived by themselves, administrators and learners in the Northern Region. Hypothesis 1. The perception of themselves, administrators and learners on the expected roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs is different. 2. The perception of themselves, administrators and learners on the actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs is different 3. The expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs as perceived by each of the sampling groups are different. Procedures The sample included Radio Correspondence Group Organizers, administrators and learners in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs in the Northern Region. Questionnaires were sent to a total of 722 participants in this survey, and 634 or 87.81 percent of questionnaires were returned. The research instrument used in this study was a questionnaires constructed by the researcher. There were two forms: one for both Radio Correspondence Group Organizers and administrators and one for learners. Each form included two parts: the first part concerned with personal information of the respondents, the second part asked for opinions of the respondents on the expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs. Data were analyzed by being computed into percentages, means, standard deviations and one-way analysis of variance. Differences between the various groups were tested by the Schffes method. Differences between the expected and actual roles were analyzed by using the t- test. Research Findings The research findings are as follows: 1. Radio Correspondence Group Organizers, administrators and learners expected the Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs should give much importance on their three roles, Viz, the educational setting, the instructional evaluation and the relationship with learners. 2. Radio Correspondence Group Organizers and learners, in general, perceived that the performances rate of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs was at the rather high level. However, administrators perceived that the performances rate of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs was at an average level. 3. A comparison of the perception of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers, administrators and learners on the expected roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs showed significant difference on all aspects. In this case, Radio Correspondence Group Organizers, administrators had expected the roles more than learners on all aspects. 4. A comparison of the perception of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers, administrators and learners on the actual roles in teaching and learning Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs showed significant difference on all aspects. From the administrators point of view, Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs performed every role less than Radio Correspondence Group Organizers and Learners perceived. 5. A comparison of the expected and actual roles in teaching and learning of Radio Correspondence Group Organizers in Radio Correspondence Functional Education Levels Three and Four Programs as perceived by each of the sampling groups showed significant differences: the expected roles were higher rated than the actual roles on all aspects.