Abstract:
This thesis has two main objectives: to make a comparative analysis of Till Eulenspiegel and Srithanonchai in terms of their trickster tale characteristics and to compare their protagonists and antagonists. The study shows that while the two tales have their own distinctive elements, they have some characteristics in common. Firstly, both tales originated in the oral tradition, then got written down and have since been presented in other forms. Secondly, they share common motifs of literal interpretation, tricks, impossible tasks and uncleanliness. Thirdly, both also have similar techniques of jokes; namely word playing (using words vaguely and playing with homophones) and conceptual witty joking (playing psychological tricks, using faulty reason and asking no-answer questions). However, since they originated in different social and cultural contexts, these two tales have some characteristics peculiar to themselves. Firstly, the role and social status of the protagonist and antagonist in each tale are different from their counterparts in the other. Till Eulenspiegel acts as an "outsider" and leads a free lifestyle. Srithanonchai acts as an "insider" and becomes a famous nobleman. Till's opponents are mostly craftsmen while Srithanonchai often has conflicts with his king. Secondly, the sex motif is found only in Srithanonchai. Thirdly, each trickster uses different strategies in his word plays: Till Eulenspiegel plays with ironical words and social formulae whereas Srithanonchai plays with idioms, obscene words and synecdoche. Trickster tales play not only an entertaining role but also a psychological one for the people in each society. They are, therefore, valuable subjects for comparative analysis as universal products of intellectual creation.