Abstract:
Disasters are phenomena that cause damage and loss of lives and properties. And global warming all contribute to five times the rate of disasters and seven times the damages. The current research endeavor aimed to study methods of handling disasters and the establishment of the transitional accommodation for people affected by disasters, analyze factors relevant to the livelihood in the transitional accommodation, and offer appropriate suggestions concerning the transitional accommodation, in order to be prepared for a potential disaster. Also, the ability to respond to basic needs, as well as effects of physical and mental health and social well-being, is to be explored. There were three case studies based on the statistics from disaster statistics and accommodation assistance. An interview was conducted with 30 experts and victims in Songkla, Satun, Ubon Ratchathani, Phang-Nga, Phuket, and Krabi. In addition, there was a field trip to the transitional accommodation. Thailand has the advantage in terms of its location, due to its fertility and sufficient rainfalls in the rainy season. Therefore, the chance of encountering severe disasters is low. There have been merely storms, floods, fire, and earthquakes. The alleviation of the effects of disasters relies on readiness, experiences, and collaboration among organizations. For this reason, countries with a high rate of disasters are often prepared for unexpected circumstances and equipped with transitional accommodation, which can be divided into two types including nonformal and formal transitional accommodation such as tents, knock-down residences, existing permanent building, and permanent buildings that dedicated for evacuation. The research results revealed that part of the losses incurred are due to lacks of training. And some victims refused to be relocated was that they worried about the accommodation and the safety of their properties. And transitional accommodation is not friendly with the sensitive group. Even if transitional accommodation is not the most effective solution, choosing to stay in the appropriate, could be the most promising option. Thus, the location should be safe to reduce vulnerability and facilitative to interactions. Also, it needs to be in a good environment.