Teeranun Nakyai. Comparison of single step and two-step of dimethyl ether production with energy and exergy analysis. Doctoral Degree(Chemical and Environmental Engineering). Burapha University. Library. : Burapha University, 2019.
Comparison of single step and two-step of dimethyl ether production with energy and exergy analysis
Abstract:
The main purpose of this thesis is to assess both two-step and single-step
processes of DME productions via air-steam biomass gasification through energy and
exergy analyses, exergoeconomic analysis, and CO2 emission intensity. For the
hydrogen production, Methane co-feeding can improve the energy and exergy
efficiency. The economic reveal that the air-steam biomass gasification with methane
co-feeding also presented the lowest unit hydrogen cost of 2.69 $/kg. In the syngas
production part, the air-steam coal gasification showed the lowest unit syngas cost of
0.65 $/kg for the two-step process, while biomass gasification with air-steam agents
presents the lowest unit cost of syngas of 0.54 $/kg for the single-step process. In
addition, the utilization of oxygen-steam as agent has more energetic and exergetic
efficiencies than that of air-steam because of more energy intensive. In the
comparison of the single-step and two-step of DME synthesis, the results were found
that the single-step process has higher DME yield than the two-step because of lower
thermodynamic limitation. The single-step process achieves the highest energetic and
exergetic efficiencies of 35.79% and 26.82%, respectively. Furthermore, the singlestep-process has lower unit cost than the two-step process of about 38.34% of DME
unit cost and reduces the CO2 emission about 23.94% of total CO2 emission. For the
comparison of a gas cleaning units (Rectisol and MDEA) in a single-step of DME
productions, the Rectisol based-process has slightly greater energetic and exergetic
efficiencies than the MDEA based-process. Additionally, the DME production
integrated Rectisol unit, with the DME unit cost of 1.92 $/kg, has more cost
effectiveness than the MDEA unit.