แจ้งเอกสารไม่ครบถ้วน, ไม่ตรงกับชื่อเรื่อง หรือมีข้อผิดพลาดเกี่ยวกับเอกสาร ติดต่อที่นี่ ==>
หากไม่มีอีเมลผู้รับให้กรอก thailis-noc@uni.net.th
หากไม่มีอีเมลผู้รับให้กรอก thailis-noc@uni.net.th
กฤษกรณ์ ฉกรรจ์ศิลป์. แนวทางการดำเนินงานของโรงพยาบาลส่งเสริมสุขภาพตำบล ตามเกณฑ์มาตรฐานคุณภาพเครือข่ายบริการปฐมภูมิ กรณีศึกษาอำเภอแห่งหนึ่งในภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ. ปริญญาโท(บริหารสาธารณสุข). มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล. หอสมุดและคลังความรู้มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล. : มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล, 2557.
แนวทางการดำเนินงานของโรงพยาบาลส่งเสริมสุขภาพตำบล ตามเกณฑ์มาตรฐานคุณภาพเครือข่ายบริการปฐมภูมิ กรณีศึกษาอำเภอแห่งหนึ่งในภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ
Approach to operations of sub-district health promoting hospital in according to Primary Care Award : a case study of a district in North Easterm Thailand
Name: กฤษกรณ์ ฉกรรจ์ศิลป์
ThaSH:
การควบคุมคุณภาพ
-- มาตรฐาน
ThaSH:
โรงพยาบาลส่งเสริมสุขภาพตำบล
Abstract:
This study was a cross-sectional survey research with the objective of studying the approaches used in the operation of sub-district health promoting hospitals in accord with the criteria established for the Primary Care Award in a district in the North Eastern Region of Thailand. The study was designed to review documents relating to the evaluation of the organization using a self-evaluation form and focus on group conversation among the administrator and implementer. The sample consisted of 30 persons. Data were collected during the months March - April 2014. Data was analyzed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. The study found that in reviewing document for organization evaluation using self- evaluation technic,there were 28 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 1st Stage of Primary Care Award , 19 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 2nd Stage of Primary Care Award, and only 1 sub-district health promoting hospital that received the 3rd stage of Primary Care Award. These findings were not in accordance with the results of the evaluation done by the District Health Office which had stated that there were 28 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 3rd stage of Primary Care Award. The Focus group discussion indicated that there were three priorities involved in the consideration; leadership of the organization, strategic planning, and service system, respectively. However, the discussion groups overlooked the importance of the clients and stake-holders. Thus, there were recommendation that sub-district health promoting hospital should give priority to the clients and stake-holders by using the result of the evaluation regarding satisfaction and expectation of the clients as an input for the development of service policies and procedures, and the documentation of improved service performances. Research recommendation are that each sub-district health promoting hospital should improve their performance in accordance with the standards suitable and the context of each area by improving the efficiency of the servicing process and the criteria of value-added process and in the aspect of following the laws and regulations. A comparison of performances with other sub-district health promoting hospital should also be performed with other hospitals that have similar missions. There should be promotions encouragers an exchange of learning experience among hospitals regarding the improvement of systems in accord with standard criteria for Primary Care Award.
Abstract:
This study was a cross-sectional survey research with the objective of studying the approaches used in the operation of sub-district health promoting hospitals in accord with the criteria established for the Primary Care Award in a district in the North Eastern Region of Thailand. The study was designed to review documents relating to the evaluation of the organization using a self-evaluation form and focus on group conversation among the administrator and implementer. The sample consisted of 30 persons. Data were collected during the months March - April 2014. Data was analyzed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. The study found that in reviewing document for organization evaluation using self- evaluation technic,there were 28 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 1st Stage of Primary Care Award , 19 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 2nd Stage of Primary Care Award, and only 1 sub-district health promoting hospital that received the 3rd stage of Primary Care Award. These findings were not in accordance with the results of the evaluation done by the District Health Office which had stated that there were 28 sub-district health promoting hospitals that received the 3rd stage of Primary Care Award. The Focus group discussion indicated that there were three priorities involved in the consideration; leadership of the organization, strategic planning, and service system, respectively. However, the discussion groups overlooked the importance of the clients and stake-holders. Thus, there were recommendation that sub-district health promoting hospital should give priority to the clients and stake-holders by using the result of the evaluation regarding satisfaction and expectation of the clients as an input for the development of service policies and procedures, and the documentation of improved service performances. Research recommendation are that each sub-district health promoting hospital should improve their performance in accordance with the standards suitable and the context of each area by improving the efficiency of the servicing process and the criteria of value-added process and in the aspect of following the laws and regulations. A comparison of performances with other sub-district health promoting hospital should also be performed with other hospitals that have similar missions. There should be promotions encouragers an exchange of learning experience among hospitals regarding the improvement of systems in accord with standard criteria for Primary Care Award.
มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล. หอสมุดและคลังความรู้มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล
Address:
นครปฐม
Email:
liwww@mahidol.ac.th
Name: สุรชาติ ณ หนองคาย
Role:
ที่ปรึกษาวิทยานิพนธ์
Name: ปิยธิดา ตรีเดช
Role:
ที่ปรึกษาวิทยานิพนธ์
Name: ดุสิต สุจิรารัตน์
Role:
ที่ปรึกษาวิทยานิพนธ์
Created:
2557
Modified:
2019-10-02
Issued:
2562-10-02
วิทยานิพนธ์/Thesis
application/pdf
CallNumber:
วพ ก278น 2557
tha
Spatial:
ไทย (ภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ)
DegreeName: วิทยาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต
Level: ปริญญาโท
Descipline: บริหารสาธารณสุข
Grantor: มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล
©copyrights มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล
RightsAccess:
ใช้เวลา
0.323454 วินาที
กฤษกรณ์ ฉกรรจ์ศิลป์
| Title | Contributor | Type |
|---|---|---|
| แนวทางการดำเนินงานของโรงพยาบาลส่งเสริมสุขภาพตำบล ตามเกณฑ์มาตรฐานคุณภาพเครือข่ายบริการปฐมภูมิ กรณีศึกษาอำเภอแห่งหนึ่งในภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ
มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล กฤษกรณ์ ฉกรรจ์ศิลป์ | สุรชาติ ณ หนองคาย ปิยธิดา ตรีเดช ดุสิต สุจิรารัตน์ | วิทยานิพนธ์/Thesis |
สุรชาติ ณ หนองคาย
ปิยธิดา ตรีเดช
ดุสิต สุจิรารัตน์