Abstract:
The purposes of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of model, process and practice of law and regulation of government-run autonomous university officials and to study their desirable law practice model. The study was qualitative research using delphi technique and in-depth interview. The sample was purposively selected from a panel of 20 legal experts and indepth interviews were conducted to 6 university officials selected purposively from the university officials who brought charge or were bringing charge against the university. The research found that when university officials had a problem with the management team, there were five effective and efficient models to make a complaint. Model 1: Make a complaint to the Board of the University and then file a lawsuit with the Administrative Court or the Court of Justice. (Civil cases, criminal cases) Model 2: Make a complaint to the local police or the Crime Division and the complaint is sent to the Corruption Prevention and Fighting Commission in the public sector, the National Counter Corruption Commission, the Office of the Auditor General to file a lawsuit to the Criminal Court for fraud and misconduct, or the Court of Justice or the Administrative Court. Model 3: make a complaint to the Center of Justice or the National Peace Corps, and then file a lawsuit to the Administrative Court or the Court of Justice or the Criminal Court for fraud and misconduct. Model 4: make a complaint to Civil Service Commission in Higher Education Institutions, or Ministry of Education, or make a lawsuit to Administrative Court Model 5: Make a complaint to rights and Liberties Protection Department Office, Ministry of Justice or Department of Administrative Litigation for negotiating before the lawsuit (reconciliation process)