Abstract:
The purposes of this research were to study and compare implementation of quality assurance of the quality cycle under The Secondary Educational Service Office Area 32. The study was the divided by position Administrators and Teachers and the size of the school. A simple of 468 people. They were randomly stratified proportionally. The instrument was a questionnaire with the reliability of .97. The statistics used to analyze the collected data were frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation, and the hypotheses were test by T-test and F-test. The level of the statistical significance was at .05.
The results of the research were as follows. :
1. The implementation of quality assurance of the quality cycle under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 32 was overall found at a high level. Having considered each aspect, the systems and information management and the lowest level was the implementation provide for monitoring the quality of education.
2. The comparison opinion reviews of school administrators and teachers toward implementation of quality assurance of the quality cycle under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 32. The study was the divided by position Administrators and teachers and the size of the school. Not difference. Considering as the found that the to provide for the development of continuing education was significantly .05.