Samrit Maksong. Effect of bee propolis from two regions of Thailand on experimental infecttion of apis florea with nosema ceranae. Doctoral Degree(Biological Science). Burapha University. Library. : Burapha University, 2016.
Effect of bee propolis from two regions of Thailand on experimental infecttion of apis florea with nosema ceranae
Abstract:
The microsporiadian gut parasite, Nosema ceranae is now considered to be an
emerging infectious disease of the European honey bee, Apis mellifera. This pathogen
is globally distributed and is suspected to be displacing the less virulent N. apis. Only
one antibiotic, Fumagillin, is commonly available to combat Nosema infections.
Therefore, there is a high probability for antibiotic resistance to develop as this single
antibiotic treatment does not completely rid the colonies of infections and its use is
likely to rise with the rapid spread N. ceranae infections around the world. Moreover,
there is a need to develop alternative treatment methods because Fumagillin is toxic to
mammals, contaminates honey, and does not ready degrade over time, raising
concerns of it potential to damage human health. Recently, natural product extracts
have been demonstrated to be effective at reducing Nosema loads in infected honey
bees. I am therefore interested the effects of propolis, a plant resin collected from
introduced honey bee of Thailand, A. mellifera and from native stingless bee, Trigona
apicalis that has antimicrobial properties, on its ability to reduce N. ceranae infection
loads in the red dwarf honey bee, A. florea, a native honey bee species of Thailand.
Newly emerged Nosema-free adult bees were individually inoculated with two
microliter of 50 % (w/v) sucrose solution in distilled water containing 80, 000 spores
per bee. These caged bees were then fed a treatment consisting of 50 % and 70 %
propolis extract of A. melliera collected from Chiang Mai province and Chantaburi
provinces compared to those of propolis extracts of T. apicalis collected from those
same regions. The negative controls, Nosema-free bees without propolis, and positive
control, infected bees without propolis were also investigated. All propolis treated
bees had significantly lower infection loads and had higher survival in comparison to
untreated bees. In addition, propolis treated bees had significantly hypopharyneal
gland protein content compared to those of controls. No different effects were found
among all four propolis ethanoic extracts in this study. This occurrence might because
of the main composition of all extract were quite similar which were (3β)-9, 19-
cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, hexadecanoic acid, and 3-pentadecylphenol. Propolis extract
treatment could therefore be considered as a possible viable alternative to Fumagillin.
This natural product deserves further exploration to develop it as a possible alternative
to combat the ever growing N. ceranae infections spreading around the world.