Abstract:
This study was aimed at 1) To study public participation of three-years development planning at Ban Lao District Municipality, Chiang Rai Province. 2) To compare public participation of three-years development planning at Ban Lao District Municipality, Chiang Rai Province. 3) To study the suggestions about the problems and resolve problems public participation of three-years development planning at Ban Lao District Municipality, Chiang Rai Province. The population of the study who were the elections of 357 populations, aged more than 18 years. The descriptive statistics used in analyzing data were frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation and t-test and f-test. If the difference was statistically significant difference in the average earnings by means of the LSD. (Least-Significant Different) by presented in tabular form of presentation.
The findings were as follow:
1. Public participation of three-years development planning at Ban Lao District Municipality, Chiang Rai Province. Also included 4 fields were rated at high level. In each field divided as follows arrange from the most to the least such as participation in the decisions, participation in the operation, participation in the search for the cause of the problem and participation in the detection and tracking operations were rated at high level.
2. The results of hypothesis were that population of different gender, age and education have participation of three-years development planning at Ban Lao District Municipality,
Chiang Rai Province. Also included 4 fields, no different which does not conform to the assumptions set statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
3. The problem of the respondents found that: 1) The populations lack of care in the community meetings to present the issue as they should. 2) The community meetings three-years development planning for the municipality no publicity. 3) Projects or activities included in the three-years development planning for the delays. So, people fed up with the three-years development planning. 4) People lack of stimulation modify community problem because the problem of community was the duty of the government. 5) People and community leaders do not understand the process for community. 6) People do not know about project each year as they should. 7) Community plan pared in each year make the project development plan of the municipality little too.
4. The solutions of the respondents found that: 1) Using various measures in the attracting for people, participation of village community for three-years development planning. 2) Municipalities should promote to people know. 3) Local leaders should be emphasize the three-years development planning and lead to practical results. 4) Local leaders should arouse and opportunities to the public participate policy, planning, operations, evaluate the performance of the municipality. 5) Training the village committees, provide knowledge and understanding in the three-years development planning for publishers to people know. 6) Should be promoted about results of operations of the municipality to people know. 7) The three-years development planning each year should the project from community plan as guideline in the preparation of municipal development plans.