Abstract:
The research is an evaluating research that intends to evaluate over all context of the research, Input basic factors of the research, Researching process, and productivity of the research, etc. We have employed the integrating method that compose of both quality and quantity method to study and evaluate the outcome of the research. Questionnaires are used as the quantity tool to collect data while interviewing is used to collect in-depth information of a group of sample. Questionnaires are distributed to 2 groups of sampling. One is distributed to police officers who work on the public relation project of Amphur Kaeng-Sanam-Nang Police Station. The other is a group of people who participant in the project for 350 people.
Outcome of the research :
1) From the information that collected from officers who work on the public relation project, we had found that most of them think project operation is suitable at the medium rate, while they think context and process of the project is in the high average level. On the other hand, they think the suitability of the context itself is suited to community on the low ration is in the high average level. However, after evaluation of the context of the project in detail on each area we had found that the objective of the project has several benefits to public on the high average level, on the input basic factor we had found that officers in the project have a good attitude toward the project on the high average level, on the process of the project matter we had found that the précising appointment of the working group of the project is well and earn the high average level, and for overall operation matter we had found that people in the area are satisfied with help they gotten from police in the program on the highest average level.
2) For the people standpoint, we had found that they have a good attitude toward the program on the medium average level suitability, and after evaluation of the project they think that suitability of the context is at the high average level on the highest ratio. On the other hand, they have given the low average score to the improperly operating process on the highest ration too. Moreover, after evaluation of the context of the project in detail on each area we had found that people in the area quite ready for the program on the high average level, on basic input factors of the program we have found that most people think polices serve them with goodwill, in good spirit, and polite at high average level, and this is also true on the area of operating result that earn high level score too.
3) From the in-dept interview, the manager of the project had found that the context of the project in the respective to its objective is quite easy and valuable to people and community. It can bring the whole community together to solve their own problems. As the basic factors of the project, the organizer had found that police officers who work on the project have a good knowledge, very skillful, and a very good understanding in the operation but inadequate in amount for the project. There is a lack of budget to operation, late on distribution, lack and inadequate of material and tools needless to say all of available tools are quite old and outdate. Management of the project is efficiency because of planning and training before. On the operation aspect, the project is operated systematically because it has planed and assigned task to officer clearly. Downside is on public relation job that is unclear and inadequate, thus, some people dont know about the project. It is reporting and keeping track with the outcome quite well. There are more opinion on operation matter that is the projects productivity meet the objective such as bring people to work for preventing crime and drug. On satisfaction of the project, we are quite pleased with the outcome because it has created a good vision of police to community, on the other hand, it help to advocate police officer to work even harder.